tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8840979806248747743.post1080066282647110319..comments2023-04-17T02:09:59.165-07:00Comments on thisDev: What is Null?Roy Lebanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08749140682886637193noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8840979806248747743.post-25796595551520268532008-02-26T09:52:00.000-08:002008-02-26T09:52:00.000-08:00I agree.Of course, the nullable types shouldn't ex...I agree.<BR/><BR/>Of course, the nullable types shouldn't exist the way they do. The boxable types were a mistake. Why should I have to care about the implementation detail that some types are implemented intrinsically?<BR/><BR/>When they did C# 2.0, they must have felt that they couldn't fix it by simply making all types nullable, so they added a way for us to explicitly declare nullability. When I use the nullable types, there are too many things that don't work (aside from ToString). For example, you can't pass an int? as an out or ref parameter to a method declared with an int (and there's no good reason in the case of an out parameter).Roy Lebanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08749140682886637193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8840979806248747743.post-78340296704062311962008-02-26T07:23:00.000-08:002008-02-26T07:23:00.000-08:00And the nullable types only make it worse.And the nullable types only make it worse.Andrew M Greenehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02999256144096980826noreply@blogger.com